Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use happychat-client npm package #23630

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

unDemian
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This is an experiment to add happychat-client as a npm package to calypso.

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

// This is needed because babel doesn't play well with symlinks, this allows node_modules to
// work as symlinks (`npm link`) needed when developing one of the dependencies.
// Reference https://github.com/babel/babel-loader/issues/149
symlinks: false,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should measure how this change impacts the Webpack compile times.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will look into that when there will be a proper HC-Calypso integration in place. This is more of an experiment to test the authentication. However I don't think it would impact compile times as it will affect only npm linked packages' path.

@alisterscott
Copy link
Contributor

This branch needs a rebase. Is this PR still required?

@unDemian
Copy link
Contributor Author

unDemian commented Aug 6, 2018

Sorry for the late response, I was afk, the Happychat Client Calypso integration was put on hold as our team has other high priority work scheduled. We will most likely come back to this after the GM. So let's keep the PRs around. Thanks

@alisterscott
Copy link
Contributor

Closing due to inactivity. Please reopen if necessary.

@lancewillett lancewillett deleted the try/happychat-client branch March 29, 2019 03:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants